Dan David Foundation · 2024 · Prize ceremony & social media

On Daniel Jütte, and the ordinary substance a man climbed a ladder to destroy.

A two-and-a-half-minute tribute on a cultural historian of Europe whose work has followed a single material, glass, across centuries, and asked what different societies believed a piece of it was for.

Client
Dan David Foundation
Subject
Prof. Daniel Jütte, New York University
Direction
Daniella Koffler
Animation
Moofa Animation Team
Year
2024
Kind
Ceremony film
The subject

Daniel Jütte is Professor of History at New York University, and a cultural historian of Europe from the late Middle Ages to the present. His work has centred on the history of materiality, on what different substances meant, in different periods, to the people who lived among them.

His book Transparency: The Material History of an Idea (Yale University Press, 2023) traces the changing cultural meanings of architectural glass from antiquity to the present. Earlier work, including The Strait Gate: Thresholds and Power in Western History and The Age of Secrecy: Jews, Christians, and the Economy of Secrets, established his method: reading a single kind of object across the periods and religions that used it. The Dan David Prize honored Jütte as a cultural historian of Europe whose scholarship reads the material world as a history of belief.

The aim

Most visitors to a cathedral today look at a stained-glass window and think how beautiful. Jütte's argument is that this was not always what the window meant. In seventeenth-century England, the same object that a Catholic devotion had bought and installed became, in the eyes of a Puritan iconoclast, an idol to be destroyed. Glass, a material with several thousand years of history behind it, had been understood as a household necessity, an architectural luxury, a sign of the sacred, a sign of vanity, a proof of the wrong theology, all in different centuries and by different societies. The same substance kept meaning different things.

The film's task was to give the viewer the felt collision of those meanings. We chose the sharpest one Jütte's period offered us. A man climbing a huge ladder, at the top of a cathedral, hammer in his hand, gleefully destroying an object that other people had built thoughtfully, generations before him, and had believed was holy. That is the film's central dramatic moment. The clash of what the material was, and what it had suddenly become.

The film is designed in the spirit of the Gothic cathedrals as they looked, and the whole of it in the spirit of stained glass, the material it is about.

Source material
12th-century stained glass window from Canterbury Cathedral
12th-century Miracle Window, Trinity Chapel, Canterbury Cathedral, c. 1180–1220. Pot-metal stained glass. One of the earliest ambitious narrative window cycles in England, glazed after the 1174 fire around the shrine of Thomas Becket. The Miracle Windows narrated the healings pilgrims attributed to the martyred archbishop, drawing worshippers to Canterbury for nearly four centuries.
What we did with it
Film still: stained glass windows inside a cathedral
The window as it was meant to be seen. The film opens the film in the register of the medieval object, the light passing through coloured glass in the room the glass was made for. Before it becomes an ideological problem, it is a material with a purpose.
Source material
17th-century engraving of Puritan iconoclasm
Puritan iconoclasm, 17th century. Under Parliamentary ordinances of 28 August 1643 and 9 May 1644, "monuments of superstition or idolatry", stained glass, statuary, altar rails, crucifixes, were ordered removed from English churches. William Dowsing, commissioned "Iconoclast General" in December 1643, visited roughly one hundred Cambridgeshire and one hundred and fifty Suffolk churches with deputies, smashing glass and imagery he documented in his own Journal.
What we did with it
Film still: a man on a ladder with a hammer, in front of stained glass
The man on the ladder. The clash the film chose to place at its centre. The object that a Catholic reverence had installed, and the Puritan iconoclast who climbed the ladder to shatter it. The same glass, in the same church, meaning two things at once.
The Dan David films

Each year the Foundation chooses, with the laureate, the subject of the film they are honoured for, and we turn it into script, image and motion. The laureate sees it for the first time on the evening of the prize — on the big screen, in a room full of people who have come to honour them. Afterwards the films go out on social media, YouTube, Facebook, LinkedIn and more, and on the Foundation’s own site, beside the committee’s reasoning and the laureate’s interview, and some laureates carry them into their own classrooms, to show what it is they work on.

Jütte's film was the precursor to the material-first practice we have written about elsewhere. If the film is about lipstick, draw it with lipstick →

Get in touch

Have a prize that deserves this kind of care?

Tell us about it →